The article below can be found on several sites. Over 50 medical doctors and scientists from around the world rebut the misinformation (or rather, disinformation) put forth by those who tout the Smart Meter technology as being safe.
Ironically, yet predictably, the utility companies and those special interest groups who stand to profit from the "new infrastructuring technology" claim that the TRUTH is misinformation. This was grossly obvious at the meeting I attended last night in Springerville, Arizona. What I witnessed was exactly what I expected to witness: a talking head using talking points, dodging questions with the same talking points instead of answering the "hard" questions with an actual direct answer. While I was disgusted at this very well-rehearsed presentation, I was also thankful that I was far from alone in challenging the presenter.
Many, if not most, people are unaware of the insidiousness of this "Smart" technology and, unfortunately, not knowledgeable enough to know that the foisting of this technology upon consumers, with or without their consent, is simply WRONG.
agfauteux | 11 juillet 2012 |
Quebec-based magazine La Maison du 21e siecle asked physician David O. Carpenter, former founding dean of the University at Albany (NY)’s School of Public Health, to comment on a letter published in the Montreal daily Le Devoirlast May 24. This letter claimed wireless smart meters pose no risk to public health. Some fourty international experts contributed to the following rebuttal.
We, the undersigned are a group of scientists and health professionals who together have coauthored hundreds of peer-reviewed studies
(photo, see link above for original article)
Dr David O. Carpenter, founder, University at Albany (NY) School of Public Health on the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). We wish to correct some of the gross misinformation found in the letter regarding wireless “smart” meters that was published in the Montreal daily Le Devoir on May 24. Submitted by a group Quebec engineers, physicists and chemists, the letter in question reflects an obvious lack of understanding of the science behind the health impacts of the radiofrequency (RF)/microwave EMFs emitted by these meters.
The statement that « Thousands of studies, both epidemiological and experimental in humans, show no increase in cancer cases as a result of exposure to radio waves of low intensity… » is false (1). In fact, only a few such studies — two dozen case-control studies of mobile phone use, certainly not thousands, have reported no elevations of cancer, and most were funded by the wireless industry. In addition, these reassuring studies contained significant experimental design flaws, mainly the fact that the populations followed were too small and were followed for a too short period of time.
Non industry-funded studies have clearly demonstrated a significant increase in cancer cases among individuals who have suffered from prolonged exposure to low-level microwaves, transmitted notably by radio antennas. The effects were best documented in meta-analyses that have been published and that include grouped results from several different studies: these analyses consistently showed an increased risk of brain cancer among regular users of a cell phone who have been exposed to microwaves for at least ten years.
Brain Cancer Rates
Furthermore, the argument that brain cancer rates do not indicate an overall increase in incidence is not evidence that cell phones are safe: the latency for brain cancer in adults after environmental exposure can be long, up to 20-30 years. Most North Americans haven’t used cell phones extensively for that long. The evidence of the link between long-term cell phone use and brain cancer comes primarily from Northern Europe, where cell phones have been commonly used since the 1990s.
Children are especially at risk. In May 2012, the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics reported a 50 percent increase in incidence of frontal and temporal lobe tumors in children between 1999 and 2009. This statistic is especially disturbing since in May 2011, after reviewing the published scientific literature regarding cancers affecting cell phone users, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency radiation as a 2B, possible human carcinogen. Despite the absence of scientific consensus, the evidence is sufficiently compelling for any cautious parent to want to reduce their loved one’s exposure to RF/microwave emissions as much as possible, as recommended by various countries such as Austria, Belgium, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom.
Electrosensitivity
Public fears about wireless smart meters are well-founded. They are backed by various medical authorities such as the Public Health Departments of Santa Cruz County (California) and of Salzburg State (Austria). These authorities are worried about the growing number of citizens who say they have developed electrohypersensitivity (EHS), especially since for many of them, the symptoms developed after the installation of such meters (it takes some time for most people to link the two events).
Since the turn of the millennium, people are increasingly affected by ambient microwaves due to the growing popularity of wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi Internet. Therefore, the mass deployment of smart grids could expose large chunks of the general population to alarming risk scenarios without their consent. According to seven surveys done in six European countries between 2002 and 2004, about 10% of Europeans have become electrosensitive, and experts fear that percentage could reach 50% by 2017. The most famous person to publicly reveal her electrosensitivity is Gro Harlem Brundtland, formerly Prime Minister of Norway and retired Director of the World Health Organization (WHO).
While there is no consensus on the origins and mechanisms of EHS, many physicians and other specialists around the world have become aware that EHS symptoms (neurological dermatological, acoustical, etc.) seem to be triggered by exposure to EMF levels well below current international exposure limits, which are established solely on short-term thermal effects (2). Organizations such as the Austrian Medical Association and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have recognized that the ideal way to treat of EHS is to reduce EMF exposure.
Therefore, caution is warranted because the growing variety of RF/microwave emissions produced by many wireless devices such as smart meters have never been tested for their potential biological effects.
Well-known bioeffects
While the specific pathways to cancer are not fully understood, it is scientifically unacceptable to deny the weight of the evidence regarding the increase in cancer cases in humans that are exposed to high levels of RF/microwave radiation.
The statement that « there is no established mechanism by which a radio wave could induce an adverse effect on human tissue other than by heating » is incorrect, and reflects a lack of awareness and understanding of the scientific literature on the subject. In fact, more than a thousand studies done on low intensity, high frequency, non-ionizing radiation, going back at least fifty years, show that some biological mechanisms of effect do not involve heat. This radiation sends signals to living tissue that stimulate biochemical changes, which can generate various symptoms and may lead to diseases such as cancer.
Even though RF/microwaves don’t have the energy to directly break chemical bonds, unlike ionizing radiation such as X-rays, there is scientific evidence that this energy can cause DNA damage indirectly leading to cancer by a combination of biological effects. Recent publications have documented the generation of free radicals, increased permeability of the blood brain barrier allowing potentially toxic chemicals to enter the brain, induction of genes, as well as altered electrical and metabolic activity in human brains upon application of cell phone RF/microwaves similar to those produced by smart meters.
These effects are cumulative and depend on many factors including RF/microwave levels, frequency, waveform, exposure time, biovariability between individuals and combination with other toxic agents. Clear evidence that these microwaves are indeed bioactive has been shown by the fact that low-intensity EMFs have proven clinically useful in some circumstances. Pulsed EMFs have long been used to successfully treat bone fractures that are resistant to other forms of therapy. More recently, frequency-specific, amplitude-modulated EMFs have been found useful to treat advanced carcinoma and chronic pain.
High frequency EMFs such as the microwaves used in cell phones, smart meters, Wi-Fi and cordless ‘‘DECT’’ phones, appear to be the most damaging when used commonly. Most of their biological effects, including symptoms of electrohypersensitivity, can be seen in the damage done to cellular membranes by the loss of structurally-important calcium ions. Prolonged exposure to these high frequencies may eventually lead to cellular malfunction and death.
Furthermore, malfunction of the parathyroid gland, located in the neck just inches from where one holds a cell phone, may actually cause electrohypersensitivity in some people by reducing the background level of calcium ions in the blood. RF/microwave radiation is also known to decrease the production of melatonin, which protects against cancer, and to promote the growth of existing cancer cells.
Early warning scientists attacked
In recommending that the Precautionary Principle be applied in EMF matters, the European Environment Agency’s Director Jacqueline McGlade wrote in 2009: “We have noted from previous health hazard histories such as that of lead in petrol, and methyl mercury, that ‘early warning’ scientists frequently suffer from discrimination, from loss of research funds, and from unduly personal attacks on their scientific integrity. It would be surprising if this is not already a feature of the present EMF controversy… » Such unfortunate consequences have indeed occurred.
The statement in the Le Devoir letter that « if we consider that a debate should take place, it should focus exclusively on the effects of cell phones on health » is basically an acknowledgement that there is at least some reason to be concerned about cell phones. However, while the immediate exposure from a cell phone is of much greater intensity than the exposure from smart meters, cell phone use is temporary.
Smart meters
Wireless smart meters typically produce atypical, relatively potent and very short pulsed RF/microwaves whose biological effects have never been fully tested. They emit these millisecond-long RF bursts on average 9,600 times a day with a maximum of 190,000 daily transmissions and a peak level emission two and a half times higher than the stated safety signal, as the California utility Pacific Gas & Electric recognized before that State’s Public Utilities Commission. Thus people in proximity to a smart meter are at risk of significantly greater aggregate exposure than with a cell phone, not to mention the cumulative levels of RF/microwaves that people living near several meters are exposed to.
People are exposed to cell phone microwaves primarily in the head and neck, and only when they use their device. With smart meters, the entire body is exposed to the microwaves, which increases the risk of overexposure to many organs.
In addition to these erratic bursts of modulated microwaves coming from smart meters that are transferring usage data to electric, gas and water utilities, wireless and wired smart (powerline communication) meters are also a major source of ‘’dirty electricity’’ (electrical interference of high frequency voltage transients typically of kilohertz frequencies). Indeed, some scientists, such as American epidemiologist Sam Milham, believe that many of the health complaints about smart meters may also be caused by dirty electricity generated by the « switching » power supply activating all smart meters. Since the installation of filters to reduce dirty electricity circulating on house wiring has been found to relieve symptoms of EHS in some people, this method should be considered among the priorities aimed at reducing potential adverse impacts.
Rather be safe than sorry
The apparent adverse health effects noted with smart meter exposure are likely to be further exacerbated if smart appliances that use wireless communications become the norm and further increase unwarranted exposure.
To date, there have been few independent studies of the health effects of such sources of more continuous but lower intensity microwaves. However, we know after decades of studies of hazardous chemical substances, that chronic exposure to low concentrations of microwaves can cause equal or even greater harm than an acute exposure to high concentrations of the same microwaves.
This is why so many scientists and medical experts urgently recommend that measures following the Precautionary Principle be applied immediately — such as using wired meters — to reduce biologically inappropriate microwave exposure. We are not advocating the abolishment of RF technologies, only the use of common sense and the development and implementation of best practices in using these technologies in order to reduce exposure and risk of health hazards.
1. Scientific papers on EMF health effects
2. Explanation and studies on electrosensitivity
3. Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology
• David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health & the Environment, University at Albany, USA
• Jennifer Armstrong, MD, Past President, Canadian Society of Environmental Medicine, Founder, Ottawa Environmental Health Clinic, Ontario, Canada
• Pierre L. Auger, M. D., FRCPC, Occupational medicine, Multiclinique des accidentés 1464, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
• Fiorella Belpoggi, Director Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, Ramazzini Institute, Bologna, Italy
• Martin Blank, PhD, former President, Bioelectromagnetics Society, Special Lecturer, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
• Barry Breger, MD, Centre d’intégration somatosophique (orthomolecular medicine), Montreal, Quebec
• John Cline, MD, Professor, Institute for Functional Medicine, Federal Way, WA, USA, Medical Director, Cline Medical Centre, Nanaimo, BC, Canada
• Alvaro Augusto de Salles, PhD, Professor of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
• Christos Georgiou, Prof. Biochemistry, Biology Department, University of Patras, Greece
• Andrew Goldsworthy, PhD, Honorary lecturer in Biology, Imperial College, London, UK
• Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Director, Centro de Investigación, Hospital Universitario LA Fe, Valencia, Spain
• Livio Giuliani, PhD, Senior Researcher, National Insurance Institute (INAIL), Chief of Radiation and Ultrasounds Research Unit, Rome, Italy
• Yury Grigoriev, PhD, Chair Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Moscow, Russia
• Settimio Grimaldi, PhD, Director, Institute of Translational Pharmacology (Neurobiology and molecular medicine), National Research Council, Rome, Italy
• Magda Havas, PhD, Centre for Health Studies, Trent University, Canada
• Lennart Hardell, MD, Professor of Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
• Denis L. Henshaw, PhD, Professor of Physics, Head of The Human Radiation Effects Group, University of Bristol, UK
• Ronald B. Herberman, MD, Chairman of Board, Environmental Health Trust, and Founding Director emeritus, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, USA
• Isaac Jamieson, PhD Environmental Science (electromagnetic phenomena in the built environment), independent architect, scientist and environmental consultant, Hertfordshire, UK
• Olle Johansson, PhD, Professor of Neuroscience (Experimental Dermatology Unit), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
• Yury Kronn, PhD, Soviet authority on physics of nonlinear vibrations and high frequency electromagnetic vibrations, founder of Energy Tools International, Oregon, USA
• Henry Lai, PhD, Professor of Bioengineering, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
• Abraham R. Liboff, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
• Don Maisch, PhD, Researcher on radiation exposure standards for telecommunications frequency, EMFacts Consultancy, Tasmania, Australia
• Andrew A. Marino, MD, PhD, JD, Professor of Neurology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
• Karl Maret, MD, M.Eng., President, Dove Health Alliance, Aptos, CA, USA
• Sam Milham, MD, former chief epidemiologist, Washington State Department of Health, USA
• Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
• Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Public Health Department, Salzburg State Government, Austria
• Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Director, Center for Excellence in Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, USA
• John Podd, PhD, Professor of Psychology (experimental neuropsychology), Massey University, New-Zeland
• William J. Rea, MD, thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, founder of the Environmental Health Center, Dallas, Tx, USA
• Elihu D. Richter, MD, Professor, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
• Leif G. Salford, MD, Senior Professor of Neurosurgery, Lund University, Sweden
• Nesrin Seyhan, MD, Founder and Chair of Biophysics, Medical Faculty of Gazi University, Turkey
• Cyril W. Smith, PhD, lead author of “Electromagnetic Man”, retired from Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Salford, UK
• Morando Soffritti, MD, Scientific Director of the European Foundation for Oncology and Environmental Sciences “B. Ramazzini” in Bologna, Italy
• Antoinette “Toni” Stein, PhD, Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE-EMF Working Group), Co-Coordinator, Berkeley, CA, USA
• Stanislaw Szmigielski, MD, PhD Professor of Pathophysiology, Consulting Expert, former director of Microwave Safety, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland
• Bradford S. Weeks, MD, Director, The Weeks Clinic, Clinton, WA, USA
• Stelios A. Zinelis, MD, Vice-President, Hellenic Cancer Society, Cefallonia, Greece
Coordination: Andre Fauteux, Publisher and Editor in chief, la Maison du 21e siècle magazine, Sainte-Adele, Quebec, Canada.
Pas d’articles similaires.
-------------------------------------------------
Dr. Carlos Sosa is the latest signatory of ...
Smart Meters: Correcting the Gross Misinformation
http://maisonsaine.ca/smart-meters-correcting-the-gross-misinformation/
So far, 52 scientists and physicians from around the world have
signed this important letter.
From
http://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/2010/06/01/the-dr-carlos-sosa-m-d-story/
THE DR. CARLOS SOSA M.D. STORY
Please let me introduce myself. My name is Dr. Carlos Sosa, M.D.
(physician and surgeon) and I'm presently living in Medellin,
Colombia in South America.
During the month of May 2006, I was forced to leave my house because
of the symptoms caused to me and my family by the microwaves of a
wireless Internet (WiFi) mast (or antenna). The structure had been in
our building for nearly three years and the company that owned it had
been slowly raising the transmission frequency.
In May/06 I started feeling a terrible sense of unwellness:
headaches, dizziness, insomnia, nausea, irritability, amnesia or
forgetfulness and lack of attention or concentration capacity. I
couldn't bear being close to my house or to any other microwave mast,
be it cell phone or WiFi antennas. I had to leave my house together
with my whole family just to find out that the city was flooded by
some 4000 masts that wouldn't 't leave a single irradiated spot for
us to live in.
I could sense the electromagnetic fields that were being given off by
these antennas blocks away before I could even see them. Many times I
felt like a burning candle in the back part of my head (occipital).
We had to move to five different apartments all over the city because
the situation was the same no matter where we went. I couldn't find
physical or mental peace anywhere in the city. I couldn't study again
which, being a Medical Doctor is a tragedy. Studying is my life and I
wasn't able to remember or to concentrate. I had to resign my
position at the hospital where I worked because there were various
microwave cell phone masts around the hospital. I could not stand
being inside the Emergency Service because the electromagnetic
contamination was just too high and I felt pain just trying to find a
place to park the car. That used to be my daily routine.
Despite the fact that I tried to get help from local health
authorities and the National Ministry of Communications of Colombia,
nobody actually helped me. I sent my written reports with medical
evidence to our city Health Secretary. He probably laughed a lot.
A few months later I found out of Dr. William Rea who runs the
Environmental Health Clinic in Dallas, Texas. I left immediately in
search of his help. I already knew I had Microwave Syndrome. The
alterations in my physiology were serious enough to seek help
anywhere in the world.
In Colombia, not a single medical doctor is trained in any of the
universities to treat this problem. It's simply not taught anywhere
in pre-graduate or graduate programs in medical schools around the
country. Plus, being a medical doctor, I know of the IGNORANCE and
DOGMATISM of the medical profession. If I made it public I would be
tried for witchcraft. Despite this, I tried a very prestigious
neurologist who had studied in Great Britain. He didn't even know the
syndrome existed in Medicine and he tried to laugh before I showed
him my box with some 2000 medical publications from all medical
specialties written by doctors from all over the world.
In Dallas I was able to meet people from the five continents with
exactly my same story: they had been subject to microwave radiation
from a mast that was one, two, three or four blocks away.
I was not considering the possibility of surviving in the measure
that my neurological functions were deeply affected. My best option
at that point in time was committing suicide and I thought about it
every hour of every day. Dr. Rea made the diagnosis of a toxic
encephalopathy, immune dysregulation and dysautonomy. All of these
diagnoses are a direct consequence of microwave irradiation. It had
been many years since I had cried. I stayed in the clinic's rest room
for half an hour trying to vanish the traces of the tears and my red
eyes. I knew how serious the situation was. Basically all of my life,
my profession and my neurological integrity was at stake.
Dr. Rea taught me a lot. I will be eternally grateful to him. Though
he wanted me to stay for two or three months, my economical situation
did not allow for it. The very first day I had to spend almost all of
my money in lab examinations. The medical results at the clinic
spread through all of the gamut of possibilities from no response,
partial recovery, functional symptoms, to total cure.
I returned to Colombia in search of a place to hide from microwaves
in the jungle. I visited tens of towns and states around the country.
The nation is totally contaminated with electromagnetic smog. And
Colombia is far better than any city in the United States or Europe.
I finally managed to find a spot at one of the turns of the Andes
Mountains. It was a beautiful place with a creek, a forest, a 200
year old house with no electricity and pure air. (All those
interested, please just write to karlkropotkin@yahoo.com). Though I
could sense the electromagnetic fields coming probably from radar
units, there was a big reduction in the symptoms that allowed me to
start recovering. After staying there for 5 months I had to return to
the city, because I was starting to feel the microwaves of the
airplanes crossing in the sky. Unfortunately, there was an
international air navigation route on the sky and I had to leave in
very much pain back to the city.
It was Dr. George Carlo, head of the epidemiology branch of the CTIA
of the United States, who denounced publicly the evidence that they
had concerning genetic damages, lymphomas, rupture of the
brain-blood-barrier, presence of micronuclei, etc. The criteria used
in Medicine and specifically in Epidemiology to establish a causal
relationship between a chemical, bacterial or physical agent and
disease, were fulfilled in less than ten years, states Carlo. These
criteria, known as the Koch-Henle postulates, have proven that
microwaves from cell phone telephony affect human health in a
catastrophic way.
Not a single government in the world cares. Only through litigation
will changes become effective.
My case, just like the case of other medical doctors who are or have
been electro-sensitive, is just another modern version of infamy.
Among these is the case of the former director of WHO and Norwegian
prime minister: Gro Harlem Brundtland. She had forbidden journalists
from using cell phones in her office because of her EHS
(electrohypersensitivity). The news was made public in Norway and
Sweden. A few months later, she had to abandon the leadership of the
World Health Organization. Many point to Michael Repacholi and the
the cell phone industry as authors of this proscription. Dr.
Brundtland eventually became another patient in Dallas.
Like her, Dr. Arthur Firstenberg and Dr. Lisa Nagy have become the
tips of the icebergs. There is no doubt: the Microwave Syndrome is
not only the biggest experiment in the history of Mankind, but also,
it is one of the biggest epidemics recorded in Medicine (after the
Black Death, influenza, malaria, AIDS, etc). The Health Department of
the State of California is estimating that the total number of people
affected in the United States by EHS or the Microwave Syndrome is
over ONE MILLION people.
In not a single Medicine book or journal in the world, be it a
genetics, a physiology, a histology, a molecular biology, a
biochemistry, a microbiology, an internal medicine, a pediatrics, a
surgery, a neurology, a cardiology, or any other text does it say
that the human cell was designed to to withstand microwave radiation
day and night throughout the years. This is a creation, an invention
or a lie from the cell phone industry. This industry was set up by
engineers, physicist, electricians and many times, by graduates of
elementary school who had no credentials and no knowledge of Medicine
whatsoever. That's the reason why many of us are ill or actually
dying. As long as the cell phone industry owns the World Health
Organization, the crime will proceed. The credibility gap of the WHO
extends well beyond the Milky Way. The ethical conflict is patent.
The international epidemic of the microwave syndrome is getting to
levels of genocide. And Michael Repacholi is internationally
responsible for CRIMES AGAINST MANKIND. The knowledge was there since
the 1920?s.
Originally described in the Soviet Union during the 1940?s and
1950?s, the Microwave Syndrome, also called Electromagnetic
Hypersensitivity, Microwave Disease, Radio-frequency Sickness, Radar
Disease, Electric Sensitivity, Cell Phone Disease, Cell Phone Mast
Disease constitutes a CRIME AGAINST MANKIND on behalf of the
international cell phone industry. Soviet medical reports were
already describing the damaging action of electromagnetic fields on
human beings in the 1920?s. The microwaving of approximately 80-90%
of the human population is, according to Dr. Leif Salford of the
Neurosurgery Department of Lund University in Sweden, the greatest
experiment ever conducted against Man. Medical ethics codes have been
violated by the World Health Organization taken over by the the cell
phone industry in 1996.
The Microwave Syndrome or Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity,
constitutes a criminal action that has violated medical ethics, the
Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, and Human Rights of MANKIND
as a species. It is an international HOLOCAUST that is killing
hundreds of thousands around the world. Not a single health authority
in Great Britain, the United States, Spain, Germany, France or
Colombia cares at all.
Taking into account the medical literature of the Soviet Union,
Poland and Czechoslovakia, the total number of international medical
references concerning this problem easily exceeds 100 million and
they started to be published more than 80 years ago. The problem is
not new. Furthermore, the British government knew of the symptoms of
the operators of the radar antennas during the Second World War: the
same symptoms that people who are subject to microwaves from cell
phone masts experience. Microwave radiation is pertinent to cause
death. Not a single government in the world cares because of the
giant fortunes involved.
The World Health Organization, years ago a very serious and
respectable institution, was bought in 1996 by the former director of
the ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-ionizing Radiation
Protection), Michael Repacholi. The ICNIRP is a private organization
that was built up in order to protect the private interests of the
American and European cell phone industry. In many regards, cell
phones pose an equivalent problem as cocaine traffickers. No matter
how damaging it actually is, there will always be corrupted officials
who are willing to sell their conscience for money and look the other
way. There is a present international campaign to submit Michael
Repacholi to international justice for CRIMES AGAINST MANKIND. I
personally hold Michael Repacholi responsible for my EHS. This person
has to be sent to criminal trial for his actions against millions of
human beings in the five continents. The WHO knew of this damaging
action decades before the introduction of cell phone telephony in the
world. Repacholi did not care. In 1973 the WHO conducted an
international Congress in Warsaw under the auspices of the government
of Poland and the Federal Drug Administration of the United States.
The results of this congress were published in the book entitled:
"Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation." I have
heard that Michael Repacholi ordered this book burned.
Repacholi recently revealed that up to half of the funds raised for
the EMF project of the World Health Organization came from the cell
phone industry.
The conflict of interests is like having the tobacco industry sponsor
research in order to deny that cigarettes cause lung cancer, mouth
floor cancer, larynx cancer, pharynx cancer, coronary disease,
peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
myocardial infarction, strokes, etc.
The Microwave Syndrome, as it was originally described by Soviet
medical investigators consists of:
- A neurasthenic syndrome: fatigue, irritability, nausea, headaches,
anorexia, depression, dizziness
- A cardiovascular syndrome: bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension
or low blood pressure
- A diencephalic syndrome: memory problems, concentration
difficulties, insomnia
Chronic exposure to microwaves is associated with dermatological
lesions, leukemia, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease,
attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (epidemic), brain tumors
(epidemic), changes in the electroencephalogram, cardiac arrhythmias,
reproduction problems, allergies, hypothyroidism, sinusitis, chronic
fatigue syndrome, etc.
Because it was known since the 1920?s that microwaves are bio-active,
lawyers like Peter Angelos in the USA are making a fortune in
litigation processes (similar to those against the tobacco industry)
against the cell phone industry. Not only that, but Motorola openly
lied to the federal government and its agencies when it stated that
they had thousands of studies that proved that microwaves caused no
ham. Last year, the judicial system of the United States established
that the brain tumor that the patient Sharesa Price had was a direct
consequence of cell phone use. Repacholi is totally silent, as so as
the cell phone industry and the World Health Organization.
Because of this grave crisis that almost cost me my life, I started
investigating on a possible cure for EHS or microwave syndrome. I
developed an approach that reconstructs previous Soviet treatments
and modern medicine. I started my own site in the hope of helping
people around the world to overcome this tragedy (
www.thesanctuarydrsosa.com ). I presently live outside the city in a
place with a very low microwave radiation level- a sanctuary.
Colombia has had some of the most astonishing cases in the world. One
of them was located in Valledupar in the northern part of the
country. One thousand people in El Amparo neighborhood are sick
because of two giant cell phone masts. They are selling 250 houses
because of the microwave syndrome people are suffering. The
government says it's just coincidence.
I want to dedicate my life to help other patients who like me, are
facing an infamous situation caused by human greed. I have tons of
medical information that I want to share with everybody. Feel free to
contact me. There is hope and Medicine does in fact have treatment
options to offer.
Dr. Carlos Sosa, M.D.
Medellin, Colombia
South America
karlkropotkin@yahoo.com
Ironically, yet predictably, the utility companies and those special interest groups who stand to profit from the "new infrastructuring technology" claim that the TRUTH is misinformation. This was grossly obvious at the meeting I attended last night in Springerville, Arizona. What I witnessed was exactly what I expected to witness: a talking head using talking points, dodging questions with the same talking points instead of answering the "hard" questions with an actual direct answer. While I was disgusted at this very well-rehearsed presentation, I was also thankful that I was far from alone in challenging the presenter.
Many, if not most, people are unaware of the insidiousness of this "Smart" technology and, unfortunately, not knowledgeable enough to know that the foisting of this technology upon consumers, with or without their consent, is simply WRONG.
Smart Meters: Correcting the Gross Misinformation
http://maisonsaine.ca/smart-meters-correcting-the-gross-misinformation/agfauteux | 11 juillet 2012 |
Quebec-based magazine La Maison du 21e siecle asked physician David O. Carpenter, former founding dean of the University at Albany (NY)’s School of Public Health, to comment on a letter published in the Montreal daily Le Devoirlast May 24. This letter claimed wireless smart meters pose no risk to public health. Some fourty international experts contributed to the following rebuttal.
We, the undersigned are a group of scientists and health professionals who together have coauthored hundreds of peer-reviewed studies
(photo, see link above for original article)
Dr David O. Carpenter, founder, University at Albany (NY) School of Public Health on the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). We wish to correct some of the gross misinformation found in the letter regarding wireless “smart” meters that was published in the Montreal daily Le Devoir on May 24. Submitted by a group Quebec engineers, physicists and chemists, the letter in question reflects an obvious lack of understanding of the science behind the health impacts of the radiofrequency (RF)/microwave EMFs emitted by these meters.
The statement that « Thousands of studies, both epidemiological and experimental in humans, show no increase in cancer cases as a result of exposure to radio waves of low intensity… » is false (1). In fact, only a few such studies — two dozen case-control studies of mobile phone use, certainly not thousands, have reported no elevations of cancer, and most were funded by the wireless industry. In addition, these reassuring studies contained significant experimental design flaws, mainly the fact that the populations followed were too small and were followed for a too short period of time.
Non industry-funded studies have clearly demonstrated a significant increase in cancer cases among individuals who have suffered from prolonged exposure to low-level microwaves, transmitted notably by radio antennas. The effects were best documented in meta-analyses that have been published and that include grouped results from several different studies: these analyses consistently showed an increased risk of brain cancer among regular users of a cell phone who have been exposed to microwaves for at least ten years.
Brain Cancer Rates
Furthermore, the argument that brain cancer rates do not indicate an overall increase in incidence is not evidence that cell phones are safe: the latency for brain cancer in adults after environmental exposure can be long, up to 20-30 years. Most North Americans haven’t used cell phones extensively for that long. The evidence of the link between long-term cell phone use and brain cancer comes primarily from Northern Europe, where cell phones have been commonly used since the 1990s.
Children are especially at risk. In May 2012, the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics reported a 50 percent increase in incidence of frontal and temporal lobe tumors in children between 1999 and 2009. This statistic is especially disturbing since in May 2011, after reviewing the published scientific literature regarding cancers affecting cell phone users, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency radiation as a 2B, possible human carcinogen. Despite the absence of scientific consensus, the evidence is sufficiently compelling for any cautious parent to want to reduce their loved one’s exposure to RF/microwave emissions as much as possible, as recommended by various countries such as Austria, Belgium, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom.
Electrosensitivity
Public fears about wireless smart meters are well-founded. They are backed by various medical authorities such as the Public Health Departments of Santa Cruz County (California) and of Salzburg State (Austria). These authorities are worried about the growing number of citizens who say they have developed electrohypersensitivity (EHS), especially since for many of them, the symptoms developed after the installation of such meters (it takes some time for most people to link the two events).
Since the turn of the millennium, people are increasingly affected by ambient microwaves due to the growing popularity of wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi Internet. Therefore, the mass deployment of smart grids could expose large chunks of the general population to alarming risk scenarios without their consent. According to seven surveys done in six European countries between 2002 and 2004, about 10% of Europeans have become electrosensitive, and experts fear that percentage could reach 50% by 2017. The most famous person to publicly reveal her electrosensitivity is Gro Harlem Brundtland, formerly Prime Minister of Norway and retired Director of the World Health Organization (WHO).
While there is no consensus on the origins and mechanisms of EHS, many physicians and other specialists around the world have become aware that EHS symptoms (neurological dermatological, acoustical, etc.) seem to be triggered by exposure to EMF levels well below current international exposure limits, which are established solely on short-term thermal effects (2). Organizations such as the Austrian Medical Association and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have recognized that the ideal way to treat of EHS is to reduce EMF exposure.
Therefore, caution is warranted because the growing variety of RF/microwave emissions produced by many wireless devices such as smart meters have never been tested for their potential biological effects.
Well-known bioeffects
While the specific pathways to cancer are not fully understood, it is scientifically unacceptable to deny the weight of the evidence regarding the increase in cancer cases in humans that are exposed to high levels of RF/microwave radiation.
The statement that « there is no established mechanism by which a radio wave could induce an adverse effect on human tissue other than by heating » is incorrect, and reflects a lack of awareness and understanding of the scientific literature on the subject. In fact, more than a thousand studies done on low intensity, high frequency, non-ionizing radiation, going back at least fifty years, show that some biological mechanisms of effect do not involve heat. This radiation sends signals to living tissue that stimulate biochemical changes, which can generate various symptoms and may lead to diseases such as cancer.
Even though RF/microwaves don’t have the energy to directly break chemical bonds, unlike ionizing radiation such as X-rays, there is scientific evidence that this energy can cause DNA damage indirectly leading to cancer by a combination of biological effects. Recent publications have documented the generation of free radicals, increased permeability of the blood brain barrier allowing potentially toxic chemicals to enter the brain, induction of genes, as well as altered electrical and metabolic activity in human brains upon application of cell phone RF/microwaves similar to those produced by smart meters.
These effects are cumulative and depend on many factors including RF/microwave levels, frequency, waveform, exposure time, biovariability between individuals and combination with other toxic agents. Clear evidence that these microwaves are indeed bioactive has been shown by the fact that low-intensity EMFs have proven clinically useful in some circumstances. Pulsed EMFs have long been used to successfully treat bone fractures that are resistant to other forms of therapy. More recently, frequency-specific, amplitude-modulated EMFs have been found useful to treat advanced carcinoma and chronic pain.
High frequency EMFs such as the microwaves used in cell phones, smart meters, Wi-Fi and cordless ‘‘DECT’’ phones, appear to be the most damaging when used commonly. Most of their biological effects, including symptoms of electrohypersensitivity, can be seen in the damage done to cellular membranes by the loss of structurally-important calcium ions. Prolonged exposure to these high frequencies may eventually lead to cellular malfunction and death.
Furthermore, malfunction of the parathyroid gland, located in the neck just inches from where one holds a cell phone, may actually cause electrohypersensitivity in some people by reducing the background level of calcium ions in the blood. RF/microwave radiation is also known to decrease the production of melatonin, which protects against cancer, and to promote the growth of existing cancer cells.
Early warning scientists attacked
In recommending that the Precautionary Principle be applied in EMF matters, the European Environment Agency’s Director Jacqueline McGlade wrote in 2009: “We have noted from previous health hazard histories such as that of lead in petrol, and methyl mercury, that ‘early warning’ scientists frequently suffer from discrimination, from loss of research funds, and from unduly personal attacks on their scientific integrity. It would be surprising if this is not already a feature of the present EMF controversy… » Such unfortunate consequences have indeed occurred.
The statement in the Le Devoir letter that « if we consider that a debate should take place, it should focus exclusively on the effects of cell phones on health » is basically an acknowledgement that there is at least some reason to be concerned about cell phones. However, while the immediate exposure from a cell phone is of much greater intensity than the exposure from smart meters, cell phone use is temporary.
Smart meters
Wireless smart meters typically produce atypical, relatively potent and very short pulsed RF/microwaves whose biological effects have never been fully tested. They emit these millisecond-long RF bursts on average 9,600 times a day with a maximum of 190,000 daily transmissions and a peak level emission two and a half times higher than the stated safety signal, as the California utility Pacific Gas & Electric recognized before that State’s Public Utilities Commission. Thus people in proximity to a smart meter are at risk of significantly greater aggregate exposure than with a cell phone, not to mention the cumulative levels of RF/microwaves that people living near several meters are exposed to.
People are exposed to cell phone microwaves primarily in the head and neck, and only when they use their device. With smart meters, the entire body is exposed to the microwaves, which increases the risk of overexposure to many organs.
In addition to these erratic bursts of modulated microwaves coming from smart meters that are transferring usage data to electric, gas and water utilities, wireless and wired smart (powerline communication) meters are also a major source of ‘’dirty electricity’’ (electrical interference of high frequency voltage transients typically of kilohertz frequencies). Indeed, some scientists, such as American epidemiologist Sam Milham, believe that many of the health complaints about smart meters may also be caused by dirty electricity generated by the « switching » power supply activating all smart meters. Since the installation of filters to reduce dirty electricity circulating on house wiring has been found to relieve symptoms of EHS in some people, this method should be considered among the priorities aimed at reducing potential adverse impacts.
Rather be safe than sorry
The apparent adverse health effects noted with smart meter exposure are likely to be further exacerbated if smart appliances that use wireless communications become the norm and further increase unwarranted exposure.
To date, there have been few independent studies of the health effects of such sources of more continuous but lower intensity microwaves. However, we know after decades of studies of hazardous chemical substances, that chronic exposure to low concentrations of microwaves can cause equal or even greater harm than an acute exposure to high concentrations of the same microwaves.
This is why so many scientists and medical experts urgently recommend that measures following the Precautionary Principle be applied immediately — such as using wired meters — to reduce biologically inappropriate microwave exposure. We are not advocating the abolishment of RF technologies, only the use of common sense and the development and implementation of best practices in using these technologies in order to reduce exposure and risk of health hazards.
1. Scientific papers on EMF health effects
2. Explanation and studies on electrosensitivity
3. Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology
• David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health & the Environment, University at Albany, USA
• Jennifer Armstrong, MD, Past President, Canadian Society of Environmental Medicine, Founder, Ottawa Environmental Health Clinic, Ontario, Canada
• Pierre L. Auger, M. D., FRCPC, Occupational medicine, Multiclinique des accidentés 1464, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
• Fiorella Belpoggi, Director Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, Ramazzini Institute, Bologna, Italy
• Martin Blank, PhD, former President, Bioelectromagnetics Society, Special Lecturer, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
• Barry Breger, MD, Centre d’intégration somatosophique (orthomolecular medicine), Montreal, Quebec
• John Cline, MD, Professor, Institute for Functional Medicine, Federal Way, WA, USA, Medical Director, Cline Medical Centre, Nanaimo, BC, Canada
• Alvaro Augusto de Salles, PhD, Professor of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
• Christos Georgiou, Prof. Biochemistry, Biology Department, University of Patras, Greece
• Andrew Goldsworthy, PhD, Honorary lecturer in Biology, Imperial College, London, UK
• Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Director, Centro de Investigación, Hospital Universitario LA Fe, Valencia, Spain
• Livio Giuliani, PhD, Senior Researcher, National Insurance Institute (INAIL), Chief of Radiation and Ultrasounds Research Unit, Rome, Italy
• Yury Grigoriev, PhD, Chair Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Moscow, Russia
• Settimio Grimaldi, PhD, Director, Institute of Translational Pharmacology (Neurobiology and molecular medicine), National Research Council, Rome, Italy
• Magda Havas, PhD, Centre for Health Studies, Trent University, Canada
• Lennart Hardell, MD, Professor of Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
• Denis L. Henshaw, PhD, Professor of Physics, Head of The Human Radiation Effects Group, University of Bristol, UK
• Ronald B. Herberman, MD, Chairman of Board, Environmental Health Trust, and Founding Director emeritus, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, USA
• Isaac Jamieson, PhD Environmental Science (electromagnetic phenomena in the built environment), independent architect, scientist and environmental consultant, Hertfordshire, UK
• Olle Johansson, PhD, Professor of Neuroscience (Experimental Dermatology Unit), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
• Yury Kronn, PhD, Soviet authority on physics of nonlinear vibrations and high frequency electromagnetic vibrations, founder of Energy Tools International, Oregon, USA
• Henry Lai, PhD, Professor of Bioengineering, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
• Abraham R. Liboff, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
• Don Maisch, PhD, Researcher on radiation exposure standards for telecommunications frequency, EMFacts Consultancy, Tasmania, Australia
• Andrew A. Marino, MD, PhD, JD, Professor of Neurology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
• Karl Maret, MD, M.Eng., President, Dove Health Alliance, Aptos, CA, USA
• Sam Milham, MD, former chief epidemiologist, Washington State Department of Health, USA
• Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
• Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Public Health Department, Salzburg State Government, Austria
• Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Director, Center for Excellence in Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, USA
• John Podd, PhD, Professor of Psychology (experimental neuropsychology), Massey University, New-Zeland
• William J. Rea, MD, thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, founder of the Environmental Health Center, Dallas, Tx, USA
• Elihu D. Richter, MD, Professor, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
• Leif G. Salford, MD, Senior Professor of Neurosurgery, Lund University, Sweden
• Nesrin Seyhan, MD, Founder and Chair of Biophysics, Medical Faculty of Gazi University, Turkey
• Cyril W. Smith, PhD, lead author of “Electromagnetic Man”, retired from Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Salford, UK
• Morando Soffritti, MD, Scientific Director of the European Foundation for Oncology and Environmental Sciences “B. Ramazzini” in Bologna, Italy
• Antoinette “Toni” Stein, PhD, Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE-EMF Working Group), Co-Coordinator, Berkeley, CA, USA
• Stanislaw Szmigielski, MD, PhD Professor of Pathophysiology, Consulting Expert, former director of Microwave Safety, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland
• Bradford S. Weeks, MD, Director, The Weeks Clinic, Clinton, WA, USA
• Stelios A. Zinelis, MD, Vice-President, Hellenic Cancer Society, Cefallonia, Greece
Coordination: Andre Fauteux, Publisher and Editor in chief, la Maison du 21e siècle magazine, Sainte-Adele, Quebec, Canada.
Pas d’articles similaires.
-------------------------------------------------
Dr. Carlos Sosa is the latest signatory of ...
Smart Meters: Correcting the Gross Misinformation
http://maisonsaine.ca/smart-meters-correcting-the-gross-misinformation/
So far, 52 scientists and physicians from around the world have
signed this important letter.
From
http://www.electrosensitivesociety.com/2010/06/01/the-dr-carlos-sosa-m-d-story/
THE DR. CARLOS SOSA M.D. STORY
Please let me introduce myself. My name is Dr. Carlos Sosa, M.D.
(physician and surgeon) and I'm presently living in Medellin,
Colombia in South America.
During the month of May 2006, I was forced to leave my house because
of the symptoms caused to me and my family by the microwaves of a
wireless Internet (WiFi) mast (or antenna). The structure had been in
our building for nearly three years and the company that owned it had
been slowly raising the transmission frequency.
In May/06 I started feeling a terrible sense of unwellness:
headaches, dizziness, insomnia, nausea, irritability, amnesia or
forgetfulness and lack of attention or concentration capacity. I
couldn't bear being close to my house or to any other microwave mast,
be it cell phone or WiFi antennas. I had to leave my house together
with my whole family just to find out that the city was flooded by
some 4000 masts that wouldn't 't leave a single irradiated spot for
us to live in.
I could sense the electromagnetic fields that were being given off by
these antennas blocks away before I could even see them. Many times I
felt like a burning candle in the back part of my head (occipital).
We had to move to five different apartments all over the city because
the situation was the same no matter where we went. I couldn't find
physical or mental peace anywhere in the city. I couldn't study again
which, being a Medical Doctor is a tragedy. Studying is my life and I
wasn't able to remember or to concentrate. I had to resign my
position at the hospital where I worked because there were various
microwave cell phone masts around the hospital. I could not stand
being inside the Emergency Service because the electromagnetic
contamination was just too high and I felt pain just trying to find a
place to park the car. That used to be my daily routine.
Despite the fact that I tried to get help from local health
authorities and the National Ministry of Communications of Colombia,
nobody actually helped me. I sent my written reports with medical
evidence to our city Health Secretary. He probably laughed a lot.
A few months later I found out of Dr. William Rea who runs the
Environmental Health Clinic in Dallas, Texas. I left immediately in
search of his help. I already knew I had Microwave Syndrome. The
alterations in my physiology were serious enough to seek help
anywhere in the world.
In Colombia, not a single medical doctor is trained in any of the
universities to treat this problem. It's simply not taught anywhere
in pre-graduate or graduate programs in medical schools around the
country. Plus, being a medical doctor, I know of the IGNORANCE and
DOGMATISM of the medical profession. If I made it public I would be
tried for witchcraft. Despite this, I tried a very prestigious
neurologist who had studied in Great Britain. He didn't even know the
syndrome existed in Medicine and he tried to laugh before I showed
him my box with some 2000 medical publications from all medical
specialties written by doctors from all over the world.
In Dallas I was able to meet people from the five continents with
exactly my same story: they had been subject to microwave radiation
from a mast that was one, two, three or four blocks away.
I was not considering the possibility of surviving in the measure
that my neurological functions were deeply affected. My best option
at that point in time was committing suicide and I thought about it
every hour of every day. Dr. Rea made the diagnosis of a toxic
encephalopathy, immune dysregulation and dysautonomy. All of these
diagnoses are a direct consequence of microwave irradiation. It had
been many years since I had cried. I stayed in the clinic's rest room
for half an hour trying to vanish the traces of the tears and my red
eyes. I knew how serious the situation was. Basically all of my life,
my profession and my neurological integrity was at stake.
Dr. Rea taught me a lot. I will be eternally grateful to him. Though
he wanted me to stay for two or three months, my economical situation
did not allow for it. The very first day I had to spend almost all of
my money in lab examinations. The medical results at the clinic
spread through all of the gamut of possibilities from no response,
partial recovery, functional symptoms, to total cure.
I returned to Colombia in search of a place to hide from microwaves
in the jungle. I visited tens of towns and states around the country.
The nation is totally contaminated with electromagnetic smog. And
Colombia is far better than any city in the United States or Europe.
I finally managed to find a spot at one of the turns of the Andes
Mountains. It was a beautiful place with a creek, a forest, a 200
year old house with no electricity and pure air. (All those
interested, please just write to karlkropotkin@yahoo.com). Though I
could sense the electromagnetic fields coming probably from radar
units, there was a big reduction in the symptoms that allowed me to
start recovering. After staying there for 5 months I had to return to
the city, because I was starting to feel the microwaves of the
airplanes crossing in the sky. Unfortunately, there was an
international air navigation route on the sky and I had to leave in
very much pain back to the city.
It was Dr. George Carlo, head of the epidemiology branch of the CTIA
of the United States, who denounced publicly the evidence that they
had concerning genetic damages, lymphomas, rupture of the
brain-blood-barrier, presence of micronuclei, etc. The criteria used
in Medicine and specifically in Epidemiology to establish a causal
relationship between a chemical, bacterial or physical agent and
disease, were fulfilled in less than ten years, states Carlo. These
criteria, known as the Koch-Henle postulates, have proven that
microwaves from cell phone telephony affect human health in a
catastrophic way.
Not a single government in the world cares. Only through litigation
will changes become effective.
My case, just like the case of other medical doctors who are or have
been electro-sensitive, is just another modern version of infamy.
Among these is the case of the former director of WHO and Norwegian
prime minister: Gro Harlem Brundtland. She had forbidden journalists
from using cell phones in her office because of her EHS
(electrohypersensitivity). The news was made public in Norway and
Sweden. A few months later, she had to abandon the leadership of the
World Health Organization. Many point to Michael Repacholi and the
the cell phone industry as authors of this proscription. Dr.
Brundtland eventually became another patient in Dallas.
Like her, Dr. Arthur Firstenberg and Dr. Lisa Nagy have become the
tips of the icebergs. There is no doubt: the Microwave Syndrome is
not only the biggest experiment in the history of Mankind, but also,
it is one of the biggest epidemics recorded in Medicine (after the
Black Death, influenza, malaria, AIDS, etc). The Health Department of
the State of California is estimating that the total number of people
affected in the United States by EHS or the Microwave Syndrome is
over ONE MILLION people.
In not a single Medicine book or journal in the world, be it a
genetics, a physiology, a histology, a molecular biology, a
biochemistry, a microbiology, an internal medicine, a pediatrics, a
surgery, a neurology, a cardiology, or any other text does it say
that the human cell was designed to to withstand microwave radiation
day and night throughout the years. This is a creation, an invention
or a lie from the cell phone industry. This industry was set up by
engineers, physicist, electricians and many times, by graduates of
elementary school who had no credentials and no knowledge of Medicine
whatsoever. That's the reason why many of us are ill or actually
dying. As long as the cell phone industry owns the World Health
Organization, the crime will proceed. The credibility gap of the WHO
extends well beyond the Milky Way. The ethical conflict is patent.
The international epidemic of the microwave syndrome is getting to
levels of genocide. And Michael Repacholi is internationally
responsible for CRIMES AGAINST MANKIND. The knowledge was there since
the 1920?s.
Originally described in the Soviet Union during the 1940?s and
1950?s, the Microwave Syndrome, also called Electromagnetic
Hypersensitivity, Microwave Disease, Radio-frequency Sickness, Radar
Disease, Electric Sensitivity, Cell Phone Disease, Cell Phone Mast
Disease constitutes a CRIME AGAINST MANKIND on behalf of the
international cell phone industry. Soviet medical reports were
already describing the damaging action of electromagnetic fields on
human beings in the 1920?s. The microwaving of approximately 80-90%
of the human population is, according to Dr. Leif Salford of the
Neurosurgery Department of Lund University in Sweden, the greatest
experiment ever conducted against Man. Medical ethics codes have been
violated by the World Health Organization taken over by the the cell
phone industry in 1996.
The Microwave Syndrome or Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity,
constitutes a criminal action that has violated medical ethics, the
Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, and Human Rights of MANKIND
as a species. It is an international HOLOCAUST that is killing
hundreds of thousands around the world. Not a single health authority
in Great Britain, the United States, Spain, Germany, France or
Colombia cares at all.
Taking into account the medical literature of the Soviet Union,
Poland and Czechoslovakia, the total number of international medical
references concerning this problem easily exceeds 100 million and
they started to be published more than 80 years ago. The problem is
not new. Furthermore, the British government knew of the symptoms of
the operators of the radar antennas during the Second World War: the
same symptoms that people who are subject to microwaves from cell
phone masts experience. Microwave radiation is pertinent to cause
death. Not a single government in the world cares because of the
giant fortunes involved.
The World Health Organization, years ago a very serious and
respectable institution, was bought in 1996 by the former director of
the ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-ionizing Radiation
Protection), Michael Repacholi. The ICNIRP is a private organization
that was built up in order to protect the private interests of the
American and European cell phone industry. In many regards, cell
phones pose an equivalent problem as cocaine traffickers. No matter
how damaging it actually is, there will always be corrupted officials
who are willing to sell their conscience for money and look the other
way. There is a present international campaign to submit Michael
Repacholi to international justice for CRIMES AGAINST MANKIND. I
personally hold Michael Repacholi responsible for my EHS. This person
has to be sent to criminal trial for his actions against millions of
human beings in the five continents. The WHO knew of this damaging
action decades before the introduction of cell phone telephony in the
world. Repacholi did not care. In 1973 the WHO conducted an
international Congress in Warsaw under the auspices of the government
of Poland and the Federal Drug Administration of the United States.
The results of this congress were published in the book entitled:
"Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation." I have
heard that Michael Repacholi ordered this book burned.
Repacholi recently revealed that up to half of the funds raised for
the EMF project of the World Health Organization came from the cell
phone industry.
The conflict of interests is like having the tobacco industry sponsor
research in order to deny that cigarettes cause lung cancer, mouth
floor cancer, larynx cancer, pharynx cancer, coronary disease,
peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
myocardial infarction, strokes, etc.
The Microwave Syndrome, as it was originally described by Soviet
medical investigators consists of:
- A neurasthenic syndrome: fatigue, irritability, nausea, headaches,
anorexia, depression, dizziness
- A cardiovascular syndrome: bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension
or low blood pressure
- A diencephalic syndrome: memory problems, concentration
difficulties, insomnia
Chronic exposure to microwaves is associated with dermatological
lesions, leukemia, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease,
attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (epidemic), brain tumors
(epidemic), changes in the electroencephalogram, cardiac arrhythmias,
reproduction problems, allergies, hypothyroidism, sinusitis, chronic
fatigue syndrome, etc.
Because it was known since the 1920?s that microwaves are bio-active,
lawyers like Peter Angelos in the USA are making a fortune in
litigation processes (similar to those against the tobacco industry)
against the cell phone industry. Not only that, but Motorola openly
lied to the federal government and its agencies when it stated that
they had thousands of studies that proved that microwaves caused no
ham. Last year, the judicial system of the United States established
that the brain tumor that the patient Sharesa Price had was a direct
consequence of cell phone use. Repacholi is totally silent, as so as
the cell phone industry and the World Health Organization.
Because of this grave crisis that almost cost me my life, I started
investigating on a possible cure for EHS or microwave syndrome. I
developed an approach that reconstructs previous Soviet treatments
and modern medicine. I started my own site in the hope of helping
people around the world to overcome this tragedy (
www.thesanctuarydrsosa.com ). I presently live outside the city in a
place with a very low microwave radiation level- a sanctuary.
Colombia has had some of the most astonishing cases in the world. One
of them was located in Valledupar in the northern part of the
country. One thousand people in El Amparo neighborhood are sick
because of two giant cell phone masts. They are selling 250 houses
because of the microwave syndrome people are suffering. The
government says it's just coincidence.
I want to dedicate my life to help other patients who like me, are
facing an infamous situation caused by human greed. I have tons of
medical information that I want to share with everybody. Feel free to
contact me. There is hope and Medicine does in fact have treatment
options to offer.
Dr. Carlos Sosa, M.D.
Medellin, Colombia
South America
karlkropotkin@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments hailing this "smart" technology will be removed. All comments claiming that thousands of online complaints and testimonials are "misinformation" will be removed. The moderator of this page will NOT allow the talking points of propaganda to be repeated here.